Luc's "Athletic Aesthetic" Volume One Column


The Individual & The Society

Talking recently on "NewsTalk 790 Today," the debate about school vouchers returned, and the debate seemed crystallized around one proposition:  what is more important to us, society-at-large or the immediate individual?  A caller said that he should be able to move his children from an under-performing school to a better school (presumably in terms of academics, behavior, quality of teachers, etc.) so his kids can get a better education.  My argument was that vouchers allow parents to move the better-performing kids out of some problems schools, leaving more misbehaving/under-performing kids at that leftover public school, thus hurting the future prospects of the remaining students.

Both points are valid.  If you have a child or children, your main focus is on their well-being, to give them every possible opportunity to succeed in their life.  If their school is clearly an obstacle, you want to remove that obstacle -- and get them to a better school.  In a vacuum, that's what any parent would want.

Yet, we don't live isolated from society.  Our kids may get a better education through the use of a voucher to afford attending a private school, but what of all those students left at the original school?  If their school suffers because of dwindling enrollment, a larger percentage of the time dealt with behavior issues (since more of the "good behavior" kids will be gone) and a lessening of interest by teachers to endure the stress of working at such a school, those remaining students are less likely to get a diploma -- and more likely to get arrested.

If I were told that, through the school voucher program, 10,000 students could get a markedly-better education from vouchers, but that would mean 50,000 students would be left in poorer-performing schools with a somewhat-lesser chance of getting a quality education, I can't take that offer.  The greater good should ways win over the immediate.  It's my philosophy to policy, to taxes, to anything:  what helps the most in the long run, even if it means a little short-term pain for we individuals.

Then again, I may think different when I have kids.

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. johnnyj posted on 07/23/2014 02:59 AM
    After little while, I heard the sound of the keys to open the door, and then we heard the sound meter color: "? Zhaoyang, you do at home. " "Ah. " Ah a simple word, goedkope nike air max but was my interpretation of a busy taste, can not help but admire himself. M Choi opened the door and walked into my room, I'll head buried in the lower, fingers "crackling" Jianpanshangqiao hit with. M color really sigh, said: "it started working so early. " nike air max 1 dames kopen"Well man. Me "busy" to see that even the color look-meter effort at all. "What do you eat for breakfast as well as empty it? " "Wait. so I put this to do it, you eat it. " M color did not leave, walked beside me leaned over and looked at me computer and found no flaws, nike air max 1then said to me:. "That I do not interrupt your train of thought, and I went to eat. " "Ah. " I'm still too busy to be a cry, fingers faster Jianpanshangqiao hit, of course.
  2. QueenYQ posted on 09/01/2014 01:52 AM
    If you are purchasing a gem, do not be tempted to get imitation gucci replica jewelry. This is little more than plastic, and there are many hublot replica affordable options that you can choose instead. Consider buying a synthetic piece of jewelry; although these replica chanel are produced in a lab, they are real gems, and they are as beautiful louis vuitton replica as anything found in nature.
showing all comments